The Duopoly Dilemma

3 logos: Apple, Google, Microsoft

Long ago, I was a Google fanboy. I used many of their services (including Google+ and Google Wave, remember those?), was an earlier adopter of Android phones and even got the first pilot Chromebook. I interviewed for a job with them and gushed in my cover letter about how big of a fan I was. Now, I’ve come almost 180 degrees—let’s say 160 or so. I switched to iPhone years ago and have more recently begun a process to de-Google my life, starting with not using Chrome as my default browser or Google as my default search. I used this helpful article as a starting point for the rest of my journey. I signed up for Proton Mail (referral link, get first month of Plus free) and have started what will probably be a lengthy process to migrate away from gmail. I won’t completely drop Google as some things, like YouTube, are nearly impossible to replace. But I will use it much less.

Seems I’m not alone in my journey from promoter to detractor. From Ars Technica:

Google’s rapid rise from “scrappy search engine with doodles” to “dystopic mega-corporation” has been remarkable in many ways, especially when you consider just how much goodwill the company squandered so quickly. Along the way, though, Google has achieved one unexpected result: In a divided America, it offers just about everyone something to hate.

I embarked on my path with intention after the 2024 election. Since then I have hardened my resolve to de-Google when they announced that they were rolling back their DEI program and scraping their diverse hiring goals and that they would rename the Gulf of Mexico to Gulf of America in Google maps. These are craven acts of capitulation and complying in advance with the hateful Trump agenda.

Tweet from Sundar Pichai: “Congratulations to President @realDonaldTrump on his decisive victory. We are in a golden age of American innovation and are committed to working with his administration to help bring the benefits to everyone.”
Sundar Pichai is the CEO of Google

Of course, as you can see, Google is not alone in genuflecting to our aspiring dictator-in-chief. Apple Maps has also renamed the Gulf of Mexico and this week announced they would resume advertising on X, only a few weeks after its owner gave not one but two Nazi salutes.

And thus we hit the crux of the matter. When it comes to mobile phones (the software, at least), we have a duopoly. Google and Apple control the market (Android and iOS have a combined 99%+ market share globally) and while alternatives do exist, they are not practical for the vast majority of customers. A similar duopoly exists in computers, just swapping Google for Microsoft, though the situation with alternatives is a bit better there.

Tweet from Satya Nadella:“Congratulations President Trump, we’re looking forward to engaging with you and your administration to drive innovation forward that creates new growth and opportunity for the United States and the world.”
Satya Nadella is the CEO or Microsoft

For people who prefer to vote with their wallet, there is no good answer here. I don’t see an alternative to iOS or Android that is appealing to the masses coming any time soon. In my assessment, Apple is the lesser of two evils in the phone world. There are a few reasons for this:

  • Apple is better with privacy. With Google, your data and eyeballs are the product. They make money by collecting your data and selling you ads.
  • Apple has not, as of yet, abandoned their DEI initiatives and it is led by one of very few openly LGBTQ CEOs among major companies.
  • While not perfect, Apple is better at user experience.

But the differences are not that stark, and Apple charges a premium, so I can’t fault anyone who chooses Google. I am also not just moving from Google to Apple in my de-Googlefication. I didn’t switch to Apple’s email service or (desktop) browser, for example. I’ll share more about my efforts in follow-up posts to help others who might want to reduce the Google in their lives.

Now What?

Image of a magnet in the style of a Democratic donkey logo, blue on top, red on the bottom with 4 white starts horizontally in the blue half.

Well, well, well. We’re a little over two weeks into the second Trump presidency and… holy fucking shit! I think even many of us who were shouting warnings about Trump have been a little taken aback by the breadth, depth and brazenness of fuckery that has unfolded in such a short period of time. What I, at least, am not surprised by is the complete unwillingness of elected Republicans—members of the so-called “party of law & order”—to do anything at all to reign in the lawlessness or the parade of dangerously unqualified (and often disqualified) nominees for federal office.

Surely they’ll step in when he does something unconstitutional though right? After all, these people act like the Constitution is second to the Bible (with the Second Amendment maybe being on par).

Sen. Thom Tillis, R-N.C., did acknowledge that an executive branch move to turn off a federal agency “runs afoul of the Constitution in the strictest sense.”

It’s not uncommon for presidents to flex a little bit on where they can spend and where they can stop spending,” Tillis said. “Nobody should bellyache about that.”

Source

Oh, yeah let’s not bellyache about something that runs “afoul of the Constitution”.

In order to take a break from the doom spiral of today and look to the future, assuming for the moment that we manage to survive this existential crisis and still have free and open elections in two and four years, I want to pose a question: How do Democrats become the party of America’s future? I don’t plan do dive deep in Monday morning quarterbacking of the election, but I think the topic requires at least a little consideration of What Went Wrong.

To start with, I want to make it clear that I do not believe both parties are the same. The Democratic Party is far better than the Republican Party, now more than ever—though that last part is more because the GOP has gotten far worse than the Dems getting better.

But there was almost certainly a lack of enthusiasm in this last election. An estimated 89 million eligible voters sat out the 2024 presidential election. Voter turnout in 2024 was 63.9% (156.3M total votes) compared to 65.% (158.4 M total votes) in 2020 (which, granted, was the highest percentage since 1900). Netted out, more than 2 million Americans who vote in 2020 didn’t voted in 2024. Harris could have won with less than 230,000 additional votes in 3 key states.

There are many people who simply don’t see enough difference between the two parties right now. Both parties are beholden to big money donors and corporate interests. And while there are some polarizing issues that rile up their respective bases, when it comes to our actual politicians (not necessarily voters) there is a lot of common ground. Trump, despite having been president once already, is seen as an outsider. Many independent voters, unhappy with the status quo and not believing Harris would do anything differently swung to Trump, a disruptor.

And while many Democratic voters may consider themselves to be quite liberal, the Democratic platform and many leaders have remained rather moderate. This could lead to Democrats feeling like their party is not representing their views. Even though they should have known better, the numbers tell us some liberal voters sat out this election.

So what should the party do? I believe they need to—hear me out—be much more aggressively progressive. Some Democrats look at the results of the election and conclude they should be even more moderate and bipartisan to woo persuadable right-leaning voters, but I think that’s wrong. They can’t out-Republican the Republicans, so they shouldn’t try. They need to be the Party of America’s future by radically rethinking how we do things in this country.

I’m not saying the Democrats should do all these or that this is an exhaustive list, but some things that should be up for consideration:

  • Universal Basic Income
  • Complete overhaul of the healthcare system, ideally single payer
  • Campaign finance reform
  • Overhaul and simplify the tax code
  • Rethink policing, crime prevention and the justice system (end mass incarceration)
  • Gun control (duh)
  • Reign in private equity and other destructive economic forces
  • Assertively support human rights around the world
  • Fiercely protect the planet, including renewable energy

These aren’t new ideas. A few have been tried before (looking at you, single payer and gun control). Some, like tax reform, aren’t particularly “lefty” ideas. But they all entail pretty radical changes and they would generally make American lives better. None of them will be easy, and critics will say we can’t actually do any of these things. Certainly we can’t do them—wholesale—right now, but remember how Barack Obama sailed into the White House on a wave of Hope. Democrats haven’t been giving people much to hope for lately. The last three presidential elections have largely been “Trump is bad, and we’re not Trump.” Accurate, but not inspiring enough, even it if managed to work once, and he can’t be the boogeyman forever.

The starting point is a bold new vision for the party. From there you prioritize and start breaking it down into stages. Messaging will be key; make sure people understand the road to get where we want to be will be long. It won’t be accomplished in one term or one presidency. But we’ll all work together toward these goals, one step at a time. Each step improving lives. Who knows? Maybe after some wins Democrats will get enough of a mandate to start making big changes, like ripping and replacing the tax code.

What do you think? What else should be on the list? Or, do you think I’m totally wrong? Leave your comments below and let’s discuss.

Muslims and Police, What?

If you’ve been living under a rock (or aren’t American, though I suspect this is getting a lot of international attention) you might not know that America’s first Orange President has followed through on one of his more odious campaign promises by ordering a de facto partial ban on Muslim immigrants.

Partial because it applies only to certain countries. And how many of the 9-11 hijackers came for those countries? None…zero. Of course, some people noticed something curious about the Muslim countries excluded from that list, namely that they are countries in which Donald has business interests! Isn’t that special? Oh, and one more thing. People who already immigrated to the US legally are caught up in the web. Continue reading

Trump Happened

So, Trump happened. I kept hoping I’d wake up from this nightmare, or some superhero would swoop in and save us, but no, this is the reality. Donald Trump is sitting in the Oval Office at the White House.

Now what?

I’m gay, but I’m also white and male and I earn a comfortable living (aside: I’m willing to bet most in the “Gays for Trump” camp fit that description as well), so I enjoy a certain amount of privilege. If I were to put my head down, stay quiet and not cause any trouble for the next few years, I’d probably be–relatively speaking–OK.

Fuck that.

It’s not good enough. It should never be good enough, not for me, not for you, not for anyone. I plan to use whatever privilege I have to support and protect those who need it. And when I run out of privilege, I’ll keep going. This time is going to be a true test of our character. I don’t know what the fighting is going to entail, but I suspect there will be a lot it. We can’t allow our country to get less equal, less safe or less free. America has always been a work in progress. Even 18 months ago, when the idea of President Trump was a joke to almost everyone (even Donald himself), no one thought this country was perfect. But we had just witnessed an era of progress, despite unprecedented obstructionism from our historically useless Congress, dominated by a radicalized Republican party. I was excited to keep that progress going!

But that progress is going to have to wait; that radicalized party is in control, and led by a monster. For now we’ll be fighting tooth and nail just to keep what we have, to not take too many steps back.

So the first thing I’m going to do–the first of many, but we have to start somewhere–is to attend the Chicago version of the Women’s March tomorrow (or today, it’s almost midnight as I type this). Of his many bad qualities, Donald’s attitude–and resulting behavior–toward women is probably the most appalling. He views women as objects, either to be obtained like trophies or as a means to an end. They’re certainly not equals. Even without him, the Republican party had been chipping away at women’s health for years and more recently began ramping up that assault, attempting to obliterate Planned Parenthood.

It’s a small thing, but tomorrow (today) I’ll stand with my sisters and send a message.

If you come for them, you come for me, too.

You Don’t Get It

There is a common refrain coming from supporters of the recent anti-LGBT laws like HB 2, that those protesting are ignorant, and simply reacting to spin and misinformation. That we don’t get it. In the address announcing his executive order, NC Governor Pat McCrory said:

 You know, after listening to people’s feedback for the past several weeks on this issue, I have come to the conclusion that there is a great deal of misinformation, misinterpretation, confusion, passion and frankly selective outrage and hypocrisy especially against the great state of North Carolina.

And people like this guy trolls Twitter for mentions of HB 2, posting memes abusing the likeness of legendary NFL referee Ed Hochuli:

Continue reading

To Boycott or Not to Boycott

boycott

With the recent passage of some pretty crappy laws in North Carolina and Mississippi, I’ve seen calls to boycott the states.

https://twitter.com/chantal_shine/status/717911789938282498

But is boycotting the right thing to do? Boycotts have mixed results in bringing about change. The reality is they don’t often substantially impact the target’s bottom line, but instead focus media attention and harm the target’s image, according to Northwestern University’s Brayden King. How much financial impact could individuals have boycotting a state? Even if you add in the various governments that have banned travel, how many of their state and municipal employees are really traveling to MS and NC on “non-essential” business anyway?

King notes that the study has one ironic conclusion: “Companies with poor reputations to begin with are less vulnerable to boycotts, because they have less to lose.”

Extend that to states, and I think North Carolina has more to lose than Mississippi, so a boycott may be more effective there. Indeed, we’ve seen NC getting more media attention, despite the belief of many (including myself) that MS passed a worse law.

Things start to heat up when companies and celebrities get involved. I’m not talking about releasing some empty statement about how they are “disappointed” with the law. I’m talking about PayPal canceling plans to open a new facility (which would have brought 400+ jobs) and Bruce Springsteen canceling a show in North Carolina. These are attention-grabbing headlines. Continue reading

Hate in the States

msprotest
Protest in Mississippi

As I type this, hundreds are gathered in Jackson, the capitol of Mississippi, protesting the state’s HB 1523, the preposterously-named “Protecting Freedom of Conscience from Government Discrimination Act” and urging the governor to veto it. The fallout from North Carolina’s HB 2 (pdf) is still coming down. What the heck is going on?

While the recent successes for LGBT rights in the U.S.–particularly the Obergefell v. Hodges Supreme Court ruling–have caused many to let their guards down and celebrate victory, others have been urging us to stay vigilant. In his book “It’s Not Over“, author, activist  and radio host Michelangelo Signorile predicted a backlash, and warned us against “victory blindness”. It turns out, he was right.

We have seen a rash of anti-LGBT laws sweep the country, mostly at the state level and often under the guise of “religious freedom”. Let’s take a look at a few of the worst of them. Continue reading

Cleaning House

Sweeping broomIf you’re like me, you can hardly keep up with the deluge of reports of apparent police misconduct, often with fatal results.

The biggest case in the news right now is of course, that of Freddie Gray. Just today, Baltimore State’s Attorney Marilyn Mosby announced charges against 6 officers involved in the Gray incident. Those charges included false imprisonment, because her investigation concluded there was no justification for the arrest in the first place!

Recently a judge in Cook County, Illinois dismissed a case against a Chicago police detective who–while off duty–fired into a small crowd of people and killed an innocent bystander, Rekia Boyd. Of course the cop claimed that someone in the crowd had a gun…but no gun or evidence of a gun was found, and the intended target (who was injured but not killed) had a cell phone in his hand. Interestingly, the judge who tossed the case implied that the officer should have been charged with murder, a more serious crime than that he had been charged with.

Not long ago, most of us probably saw the incredibly disturbing video of North Charleston police officer Slager shooting a fleeing, unarmed Walter Scott in the back several times, then planting his taser next to the body.

I think what we are seeing is the inevitable result of the complete abdication of responsibility of police to police their own. I still believe many if not most police officers are basically good people. But as John Stuart Mill wrote, “Bad men need nothing more to compass their ends, than that good men should look on and do nothing.” We have seen that police will not keep their own house in order. In fact, those who try may find themselves punished instead of the bad guys! That leaves us–the rest of Society–no choice but to clean their house for them. The time has more than come.

Georgia Taking the Piss

Well damn, we can’t let our guards down for a minute. Not even long enough to take a leak, apparently. That Georgia “religious liberty” bill I mentioned recently was tabled? Not any more.

The Republican members of the committee considering the bill voted quickly on it while the Democratic member was on a bathroom break.

After several hours of deliberations at Monday’s committee meeting, however, the Atlanta Journal Constitution reports that Fort asked McKoon if he could pause work for a moment to use the bathroom. McKoon obliged, but while the Democrat hurried to the lavatory, the rest of the committee — which consisted entirely of Republicans once Fort left the room — quickly pulled the “religious liberty” bill off the table and began voting. A staffer alerted other Democrats who rushed to the scene, but the committee had already passed the bill by the time lawmakers arrived.

The bill will move to the full Senate for a vote.

Do we need to start a fund to provide Democratic lawmakers in … certain states … with stadium pals?

Potpourri

potpourri bowlJust some quick updates and tidbits worth mentioning:

Arkansas Governor Asa Hutchinson failed to veto the AR law stopping municipalities from expanding anti-discrimination protection beyond what is contained in state law. After the veto deadline passed, Walmart, the state’s largest employer, said they were against it. Too little, too late.

And I apparently wrote too soon in my previous post on Arkansas, as a “religious freedom” bill was also working its slimy way through the legislature there. This was, of course, another law meant to allow people to discriminate against LGBT folks and hide behind a shield of “religion”. But there is good news! In this case, Walmart weighed in against it before it was too late, and (as if by magic) the next day the Senate panel considering the legislation rejected it.

Late last week, a similar bill in Georgia was tabled by a Senate committee there, after it was opposed by a very unlikely critic: former GA Attorney General (GA AG) Michael Bowers, who once (successfully) argued in favor of Georgia’s anti-sodomy law! Bowers released a statement saying “It is not just bad public policy; it is ill-conceived, unnecessary, mean-spirited and deserving of a swift death in the General Assembly.”

Here is another piece on the so-called “social science” attacking gay parenting making the rounds among conservatives, which makes reference to the post I recently re-blogged. It’s worth a read on its own merits.

Notice something different? After using the same theme on this site for a couple years, I decided to try changing it up. It should work well on computers, tablet and smartphones. How do you like the new look?